<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cat de importanta este mentionarea sursei cand preiei o informatie?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/</link>
	<description>Economie si finante</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBadragan</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7156</link>
		<dc:creator>MBadragan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7156</guid>
		<description>Khris, n&#039;am avut nici un moment dubii la care dintre situatii te referi. Numai ca, dupa mine, nu merita atita energie consumata pe tema asta. Ba mai mult, pe mine m&#039;ar bucura. Inseamna ca am avut un text valabil pe care ajung sa&#039;l citeasca multi, poate chiar sa ajunga sa schimbe ceva in citiva (acesti citiva devenind mai multi datorita copiei). Da&#039;o incolo de citare ca nu vrem sa ne facem statui.

Pe bune, e pierdere de vreme. Si e si mai aiurea faptul ca am citit aproape la toti cei pe care ii urmaresc cite un articol pe tema asta in ultimele luni. Se fura, stiu. Da&#039; cind se fura idei gratuite e chiar bine. Zic eu. Parerea mea. Hic :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khris, n&#8217;am avut nici un moment dubii la care dintre situatii te referi. Numai ca, dupa mine, nu merita atita energie consumata pe tema asta. Ba mai mult, pe mine m&#8217;ar bucura. Inseamna ca am avut un text valabil pe care ajung sa&#8217;l citeasca multi, poate chiar sa ajunga sa schimbe ceva in citiva (acesti citiva devenind mai multi datorita copiei). Da&#8217;o incolo de citare ca nu vrem sa ne facem statui.</p>
<p>Pe bune, e pierdere de vreme. Si e si mai aiurea faptul ca am citit aproape la toti cei pe care ii urmaresc cite un articol pe tema asta in ultimele luni. Se fura, stiu. Da&#8217; cind se fura idei gratuite e chiar bine. Zic eu. Parerea mea. Hic <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romania inedit</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>romania inedit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>Khris , nu i-am injurat pe cei mari , am scris doar un articol despre spamul pe care-l face zoso , un articol documentat si la obiect .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khris , nu i-am injurat pe cei mari , am scris doar un articol despre spamul pe care-l face zoso , un articol documentat si la obiect .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iulian</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7144</link>
		<dc:creator>Iulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7144</guid>
		<description>si se pare ca si gasesc informatii utile atat timp cat media de afisari per vizitator este intre 3 si 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>si se pare ca si gasesc informatii utile atat timp cat media de afisari per vizitator este intre 3 si 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iulian</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7143</link>
		<dc:creator>Iulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7143</guid>
		<description>Multumesc pentru sugestii. Am postat si articole scrise de mine, oricum, motivul pentru care am facut acest blog nu e acela de a demonstra ceva ci pur si simplu ca utilizatorii interesati de tema site-ului sa gaseasca in acelasi loc informatii cat mai variate si detaliate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multumesc pentru sugestii. Am postat si articole scrise de mine, oricum, motivul pentru care am facut acest blog nu e acela de a demonstra ceva ci pur si simplu ca utilizatorii interesati de tema site-ului sa gaseasca in acelasi loc informatii cat mai variate si detaliate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khris</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7120</link>
		<dc:creator>khris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7120</guid>
		<description>@Taifun: nu am absolut nimic de reprosat HN, sper ca s-a inteles asta. Eu am pus o problema de principiu.
@Iulian: un blogger care traieste din preluari ar trebui sa se intrebe de ce l-ar citi cineva? Este ok sa preiei de la mine atat timp cat indici sursa.
Ca un sfat: daca citesti un articol undeva si ti se pare interesant, incearca sa preiei ideea si sa o transformi in ceva original, adu-ti o contributie proprie. Doar astfel dai valoare blogului tau.
@Flavian: nu asa se face promovarea. Ai postat un comentariu complet off topic. Multi alti bloggeri ti l-ar fi sters. Daca scrii ceva interesant pe blog incearca sa faci asa cum procedeaza Taifun: spune-ti o parere legata de ceea ce scriu si mai strecoara un link catre blogul tau. Nu trebuie sa faci copy/paste la articolul pe care l-ai scris.
@Chrysthyan: am abordat o problema de principiu. Este corect sa mentionezi ambele surse.
@r.inedit: eu m-am referit la site-urile de doi lei - pe majoritatea dintre acestea le-am trecut deja la spam. Acum fiecare ar trebui sa se gandeasca daca blogul pe care il are este sau nu de doi lei. Iti mai dau un sfat: daca vrei sa devii cunoscut, nu te pune sa ii injuri pe cei mari. Incearca sa petreci ceva mai mult timp scriind articole interesante.
@MBadragan: ai dreptate partial. Si eu citesc multe bloguri de dincolo iar cand vad un articol interesant inperc sa il adaptez la realitatile noastre. Una este sa preiei o idee pe care sa o dezvolti tu sau sa o integrezi intr-un concept propriu, si alta este sa facu copy/paste. In primul caz doar ideea este preluata insa 90% din articol este original, iar in al doilea caz 100% din articol este copiat. Eu la al doilea caz m-am referit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Taifun: nu am absolut nimic de reprosat HN, sper ca s-a inteles asta. Eu am pus o problema de principiu.<br />
@Iulian: un blogger care traieste din preluari ar trebui sa se intrebe de ce l-ar citi cineva? Este ok sa preiei de la mine atat timp cat indici sursa.<br />
Ca un sfat: daca citesti un articol undeva si ti se pare interesant, incearca sa preiei ideea si sa o transformi in ceva original, adu-ti o contributie proprie. Doar astfel dai valoare blogului tau.<br />
@Flavian: nu asa se face promovarea. Ai postat un comentariu complet off topic. Multi alti bloggeri ti l-ar fi sters. Daca scrii ceva interesant pe blog incearca sa faci asa cum procedeaza Taifun: spune-ti o parere legata de ceea ce scriu si mai strecoara un link catre blogul tau. Nu trebuie sa faci copy/paste la articolul pe care l-ai scris.<br />
@Chrysthyan: am abordat o problema de principiu. Este corect sa mentionezi ambele surse.<br />
@r.inedit: eu m-am referit la site-urile de doi lei &#8211; pe majoritatea dintre acestea le-am trecut deja la spam. Acum fiecare ar trebui sa se gandeasca daca blogul pe care il are este sau nu de doi lei. Iti mai dau un sfat: daca vrei sa devii cunoscut, nu te pune sa ii injuri pe cei mari. Incearca sa petreci ceva mai mult timp scriind articole interesante.<br />
@MBadragan: ai dreptate partial. Si eu citesc multe bloguri de dincolo iar cand vad un articol interesant inperc sa il adaptez la realitatile noastre. Una este sa preiei o idee pe care sa o dezvolti tu sau sa o integrezi intr-un concept propriu, si alta este sa facu copy/paste. In primul caz doar ideea este preluata insa 90% din articol este original, iar in al doilea caz 100% din articol este copiat. Eu la al doilea caz m-am referit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBadragan</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7108</link>
		<dc:creator>MBadragan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7108</guid>
		<description>Khris, din cite am inteles eu din cite am citit pe la tine, nu esti jurnalist, nu cistigi bani din asta. Meseria iti este alta. Pe de alta parte, efortul pe care il depui este mare. De unde as deduce o oarecare necesitate educationala care te mina. Daca am dreptate, nu prea e cazul sa te atinga absenta citarii. Pina la urma este mai importanta imprastierea informatiei, asa iti atingi scopurile, decit recunoasterea meritelor. Asta daca nu cedezi tentatiei de a fi aplaudat de cit mai multi.

Acum multi ani citeam activ &quot;Dilema&quot; si le si scriam din cind in cind. Uneori ma si publicau. S&#039;a intimplat sa scriu la un moment dat ceva despre toleranta la romani. Nu a fost publicat dar unul dintre colaboratorii permanenti ai Dilemei a folosit una din frazele cheie ale articolului meu, fara sa citeze. In prima clipa m&#039;am cam ofticat ca mi&#039;au ciobit statuia dar mi&#039;am dat repede seama ca ma simt mai bine in postura de &quot;preluat&quot; decit as fi fost in aceea de &quot;citat&quot;. Cind cineva citeaza preia ideea cu rezerve (ala a zis, nu&#039;mi asum responsabilitatea). Cind preia fara citare inseamna ca a integrat complet ideea, ca si&#039;o asuma si adera la ea. E mult mai bine, dupa mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khris, din cite am inteles eu din cite am citit pe la tine, nu esti jurnalist, nu cistigi bani din asta. Meseria iti este alta. Pe de alta parte, efortul pe care il depui este mare. De unde as deduce o oarecare necesitate educationala care te mina. Daca am dreptate, nu prea e cazul sa te atinga absenta citarii. Pina la urma este mai importanta imprastierea informatiei, asa iti atingi scopurile, decit recunoasterea meritelor. Asta daca nu cedezi tentatiei de a fi aplaudat de cit mai multi.</p>
<p>Acum multi ani citeam activ &#8220;Dilema&#8221; si le si scriam din cind in cind. Uneori ma si publicau. S&#8217;a intimplat sa scriu la un moment dat ceva despre toleranta la romani. Nu a fost publicat dar unul dintre colaboratorii permanenti ai Dilemei a folosit una din frazele cheie ale articolului meu, fara sa citeze. In prima clipa m&#8217;am cam ofticat ca mi&#8217;au ciobit statuia dar mi&#8217;am dat repede seama ca ma simt mai bine in postura de &#8220;preluat&#8221; decit as fi fost in aceea de &#8220;citat&#8221;. Cind cineva citeaza preia ideea cu rezerve (ala a zis, nu&#8217;mi asum responsabilitatea). Cind preia fara citare inseamna ca a integrat complet ideea, ca si&#8217;o asuma si adera la ea. E mult mai bine, dupa mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romania inedit</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7103</link>
		<dc:creator>romania inedit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7103</guid>
		<description>Adica daca eu dau link spre tine sunt site de doi lei , pentru ca dau trackback-uri ?   :D
Cred ca asta este unul din dezavantajele afilierii la hotnews !  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adica daca eu dau link spre tine sunt site de doi lei , pentru ca dau trackback-uri ?   <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Cred ca asta este unul din dezavantajele afilierii la hotnews !  <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrysthyan</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7099</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrysthyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7099</guid>
		<description>Si eu am fost &quot;copiat&quot; si nu m-am suparat. 
Parca ideea era ca informatia sa circule liber pe internet.
Dimpotriva, am fost incantat sa vad ca ceea ce scriu are ecou, chiar si peste granite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Si eu am fost &#8220;copiat&#8221; si nu m-am suparat.<br />
Parca ideea era ca informatia sa circule liber pe internet.<br />
Dimpotriva, am fost incantat sa vad ca ceea ce scriu are ecou, chiar si peste granite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flavian</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7094</link>
		<dc:creator>flavian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7094</guid>
		<description>Mda, am zis ca o las mai moale cu economia, dar uite ca nu ma lasa ea pe mine :)

Hai inca vreo cateva linkuri pe teme economice, eu zic ca merita atentia:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
I&#039;ve Got Friends In Low Places&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.financialsense.com/Market/pretti/2009/images/0409_clip_image010.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the chart below&lt;/a&gt; shows us, the Bank of Japan officially announced its intention to print money to buy sovereign debt on March 19 of 2001. [b]Within a month of the announcement, the Nikkei had rallied just over 19%. Post the rally peak, the Nikkei never saw this level again for four and one half years and proceeded to lose almost 48% of its value over the next year and three quarters post the initial QE announcement rally.[/b]

But I believe there are a number of absolutely key differential points we need to keep in mind when trying to benchmark what will be significant US quantitative easing efforts ahead, as I discussed above, against the experience of Japan. In my mind THE key differential is that Japan began their quantitative easing during a period in which the country as a whole was running a very large surplus. Conditions for the US could not be a further polar opposite at the moment. Japan began their QE efforts when household savings in Japan was quite high and had been for yearâ€™s prior. Again, quite the opposite of the current US circumstances. [b]Bottom line? Japan began QE from a position of internal financial strength. The US now begins QE after not having been able to internally fund its own borrowing for many moons, being already heavily indebted and in a big deficit position.[/b] And so now deficit spending in the US is to move into hyper drive, supported in large part by Fed sponsored QE? A huge contrast point to the experience of Japan.

Like the initial experience in Japan, US equities have so far responded favorably to the supposedly magic drug of monetization. But we need to ask ourselves in the larger picture, can US equities build an intermediate or longer term bull market case based on the rationale of massive government deficit spending supported by a Fed that will print money to fund that deficit spending? Can it really be that within the context of the global economy of the moment, the key competitive advantage of the US is a printing press? [b]Make no mistake about it, monetization can positively influence economic and financial market outcomes for a time. We need to respect this fact.[/b] Greenspan proved this in spades during the late 1990â€™s pre-Y2K liquidity extravaganza in the US. As youâ€™ll remember, the NASDAQ doubled. Of course the aftermath was none too pleasant, and continues as such to this day. As I mentioned above, I believe the key to navigating the investment environment ahead is to anticipate the unintended consequences of current government spending and Fed actions. Over the years it has been my experience that the most important drivers of asset prices are not the outcomes that can be seen and/or anticipated by the many, but rather the unseen outcomes that only the few dare anticipate. Hasnâ€™t this exactly been the case since equity market highs of 2007? I believe it will continue to be so ahead.&lt;/i&gt;

Mda, graficul spune tot. Se compara situatia actuala a americanilor cu recesiunea japonezilor si graficul indicelui bursier japonez de atunci. Chiar daca Japonia statea mult mai bine decat US la capitolul rezerve financiare in momentul cand au inceput sa-si cumpere singuri datoriile prin pompos-numitul &lt;a href=&quot;http://dileme-existentiale.blogspot.com/2009/03/imaginea-de-ansamblu.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quantitative Easing&lt;/a&gt;, scenariul pare sa se repete. Mult mai amplificat de data asta din cauza faptului ca US are o tiparnita mult mai &quot;performanta&quot; decat a japonezilor. Si sunt hotarati sa nu se dea batuti. Sa scoata pe banda confetti (pardon - dolari) pana cad late si bursa si economia si sistemul financiar si totul... :)

Stiu ca lumea e vesela acum. Naivitatea e in floare. Toti prefera sa auda numai despre crestere si incheierea &quot;crizei&quot;. De revenirea la baloanele vechi, stilul consumerist si viata dulce de termite. Sunt curiosi sa afle de exemplu cum Wells Fargo a avut profituri incredibile. Desi lucrurile sunt cusute clar cu atza alba, la fel ca si in alte cazuri: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/wells-fargo-expects-record-q1-earnings/16265&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wells Fargo expects record Q1 earnings
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Since the tax payer bailout of 1 trillion on toxic mortgages, Wells fargo is free to announce they are free from the losses, now that the tax payer is taking care of any losses. Seems they don&#039;t want ot participate in the Obama bailouts like a lot of banks. They don&#039;t want to abide by the rules impossed by the government. Where does that leave home owners in trouble like me-Screwed! thats what. The banks make money even in foreclosure, as they get a commission for there share holders. That means they make money in foreclosure. They didn&#039;t get any money modifiying loans. so Obama has a new bill giving the banks commissions to modify the loans. Problem is the banks are still being stingy and not wanting to participate in Obama&#039;s plan. They got what they wanted-tax payers bailout.&lt;/i&gt;
Lumea citeste si se bucura ca bancile au supravietuit la asa-zisul test de stress facut de americani. Desi detaliile nu trebuie sa le aflam, ci doar sa avem incredere: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/04/fed-orders-banks-not-to-release-stress.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fed Orders Banks Not to Release Stress Test Results&lt;/a&gt;. Ca 200 de functionari au reusit sa testeze 19 banci in cateva zile si au zis ca gata, dom&#039;le, nu mai avem probleme. Nu putem sa va dam rezultatele, nu va putem explica cum s-au facut &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/stress-test/13954&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;analizele&lt;/a&gt; asa repede cu asa putini oameni. Chestii complicate, oricum nu va intereseaza. Dar trebe&#039; sa ne credeti pe cuvant, bancile is sanatoase. Cumparati linistiti actiuni la ele... :)

Eh, dar vin ele si rezultatele la final. Cat mai poti sa scoti iepuri din joben ? Cateva luni, un an inainte ca lumea sa se uite chioras la tine ? Hai sa vedem cum ies rezultatele in primele 3 luni: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090412/ap_on_bi_ge/investor_earnings_guide&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Market rally could trip over the bottom line&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s the earnings, stupid. Optimism that the fortunes of financial companies like Citigroup were improving sparked a four-week rally beginning March 10 that drove the Standard &amp; Poor&#039;s 500 index up 25 percent. But now investors will find out exactly how companies across all industries performed during the first three months of the year. Those quarterly results will determine whether the surge was the beginning of a bull market, or just a blip.&lt;/i&gt;

Asadar saptamana asta se anunta si majoritatea incasarilor pe prima parte a lui 2009. Si mai vedem apoi cum ramane si cu bursele si cu optimismul. Pardon, naivitatea. A celor care inca mai confunda luminita de la capatul tunelului cu farurile locomotivei care vine din sensul opus... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mda, am zis ca o las mai moale cu economia, dar uite ca nu ma lasa ea pe mine <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hai inca vreo cateva linkuri pe teme economice, eu zic ca merita atentia:<br />
<a href="http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm" rel="nofollow"><br />
I&#8217;ve Got Friends In Low Places</a></p>
<p><i>As <a href="http://www.financialsense.com/Market/pretti/2009/images/0409_clip_image010.jpg" rel="nofollow">the chart below</a> shows us, the Bank of Japan officially announced its intention to print money to buy sovereign debt on March 19 of 2001. [b]Within a month of the announcement, the Nikkei had rallied just over 19%. Post the rally peak, the Nikkei never saw this level again for four and one half years and proceeded to lose almost 48% of its value over the next year and three quarters post the initial QE announcement rally.[/b]</p>
<p>But I believe there are a number of absolutely key differential points we need to keep in mind when trying to benchmark what will be significant US quantitative easing efforts ahead, as I discussed above, against the experience of Japan. In my mind THE key differential is that Japan began their quantitative easing during a period in which the country as a whole was running a very large surplus. Conditions for the US could not be a further polar opposite at the moment. Japan began their QE efforts when household savings in Japan was quite high and had been for yearâ€™s prior. Again, quite the opposite of the current US circumstances. [b]Bottom line? Japan began QE from a position of internal financial strength. The US now begins QE after not having been able to internally fund its own borrowing for many moons, being already heavily indebted and in a big deficit position.[/b] And so now deficit spending in the US is to move into hyper drive, supported in large part by Fed sponsored QE? A huge contrast point to the experience of Japan.</p>
<p>Like the initial experience in Japan, US equities have so far responded favorably to the supposedly magic drug of monetization. But we need to ask ourselves in the larger picture, can US equities build an intermediate or longer term bull market case based on the rationale of massive government deficit spending supported by a Fed that will print money to fund that deficit spending? Can it really be that within the context of the global economy of the moment, the key competitive advantage of the US is a printing press? [b]Make no mistake about it, monetization can positively influence economic and financial market outcomes for a time. We need to respect this fact.[/b] Greenspan proved this in spades during the late 1990â€™s pre-Y2K liquidity extravaganza in the US. As youâ€™ll remember, the NASDAQ doubled. Of course the aftermath was none too pleasant, and continues as such to this day. As I mentioned above, I believe the key to navigating the investment environment ahead is to anticipate the unintended consequences of current government spending and Fed actions. Over the years it has been my experience that the most important drivers of asset prices are not the outcomes that can be seen and/or anticipated by the many, but rather the unseen outcomes that only the few dare anticipate. Hasnâ€™t this exactly been the case since equity market highs of 2007? I believe it will continue to be so ahead.</i></p>
<p>Mda, graficul spune tot. Se compara situatia actuala a americanilor cu recesiunea japonezilor si graficul indicelui bursier japonez de atunci. Chiar daca Japonia statea mult mai bine decat US la capitolul rezerve financiare in momentul cand au inceput sa-si cumpere singuri datoriile prin pompos-numitul <a href="http://dileme-existentiale.blogspot.com/2009/03/imaginea-de-ansamblu.html" rel="nofollow">Quantitative Easing</a>, scenariul pare sa se repete. Mult mai amplificat de data asta din cauza faptului ca US are o tiparnita mult mai &#8220;performanta&#8221; decat a japonezilor. Si sunt hotarati sa nu se dea batuti. Sa scoata pe banda confetti (pardon &#8211; dolari) pana cad late si bursa si economia si sistemul financiar si totul&#8230; <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Stiu ca lumea e vesela acum. Naivitatea e in floare. Toti prefera sa auda numai despre crestere si incheierea &#8220;crizei&#8221;. De revenirea la baloanele vechi, stilul consumerist si viata dulce de termite. Sunt curiosi sa afle de exemplu cum Wells Fargo a avut profituri incredibile. Desi lucrurile sunt cusute clar cu atza alba, la fel ca si in alte cazuri: <a href="http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/wells-fargo-expects-record-q1-earnings/16265" rel="nofollow">Wells Fargo expects record Q1 earnings<br />
</a><br />
<i>Since the tax payer bailout of 1 trillion on toxic mortgages, Wells fargo is free to announce they are free from the losses, now that the tax payer is taking care of any losses. Seems they don&#8217;t want ot participate in the Obama bailouts like a lot of banks. They don&#8217;t want to abide by the rules impossed by the government. Where does that leave home owners in trouble like me-Screwed! thats what. The banks make money even in foreclosure, as they get a commission for there share holders. That means they make money in foreclosure. They didn&#8217;t get any money modifiying loans. so Obama has a new bill giving the banks commissions to modify the loans. Problem is the banks are still being stingy and not wanting to participate in Obama&#8217;s plan. They got what they wanted-tax payers bailout.</i><br />
Lumea citeste si se bucura ca bancile au supravietuit la asa-zisul test de stress facut de americani. Desi detaliile nu trebuie sa le aflam, ci doar sa avem incredere: <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/04/fed-orders-banks-not-to-release-stress.html" rel="nofollow">Fed Orders Banks Not to Release Stress Test Results</a>. Ca 200 de functionari au reusit sa testeze 19 banci in cateva zile si au zis ca gata, dom&#8217;le, nu mai avem probleme. Nu putem sa va dam rezultatele, nu va putem explica cum s-au facut <a href="http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/stress-test/13954" rel="nofollow">analizele</a> asa repede cu asa putini oameni. Chestii complicate, oricum nu va intereseaza. Dar trebe&#8217; sa ne credeti pe cuvant, bancile is sanatoase. Cumparati linistiti actiuni la ele&#8230; <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Eh, dar vin ele si rezultatele la final. Cat mai poti sa scoti iepuri din joben ? Cateva luni, un an inainte ca lumea sa se uite chioras la tine ? Hai sa vedem cum ies rezultatele in primele 3 luni: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090412/ap_on_bi_ge/investor_earnings_guide" rel="nofollow">Market rally could trip over the bottom line</a></p>
<p><i>It&#8217;s the earnings, stupid. Optimism that the fortunes of financial companies like Citigroup were improving sparked a four-week rally beginning March 10 that drove the Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 index up 25 percent. But now investors will find out exactly how companies across all industries performed during the first three months of the year. Those quarterly results will determine whether the surge was the beginning of a bull market, or just a blip.</i></p>
<p>Asadar saptamana asta se anunta si majoritatea incasarilor pe prima parte a lui 2009. Si mai vedem apoi cum ramane si cu bursele si cu optimismul. Pardon, naivitatea. A celor care inca mai confunda luminita de la capatul tunelului cu farurile locomotivei care vine din sensul opus&#8230; <img src='http://businessday.ro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iulian</title>
		<link>http://businessday.ro/04/2009/cat-de-importanta-este-mentionarea-sursei-cand-preiei-o-informatie/comment-page-1/#comment-7092</link>
		<dc:creator>Iulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khris.ro/?p=2154#comment-7092</guid>
		<description>Este foarte justa problema ridicata de tine. Si eu am un blog si am incercat sa evit situatia descrisa mai sus pe cat posibil desi poate pe alocuri am mai si gresit. Scriu mai putin, mai mult preaiau articole, partial sau integral, insa mereu incerc sa identific care este sursa primara, pentru ca asa mi se pare fair. Totodata, prin acest comentariu iti solicit acordul pentru a prelua si articole scrise de tine (desi sunt abonat la feed nu am facut asta pana acum) acolo unde tema o permite. Multumesc!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Este foarte justa problema ridicata de tine. Si eu am un blog si am incercat sa evit situatia descrisa mai sus pe cat posibil desi poate pe alocuri am mai si gresit. Scriu mai putin, mai mult preaiau articole, partial sau integral, insa mereu incerc sa identific care este sursa primara, pentru ca asa mi se pare fair. Totodata, prin acest comentariu iti solicit acordul pentru a prelua si articole scrise de tine (desi sunt abonat la feed nu am facut asta pana acum) acolo unde tema o permite. Multumesc!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

